The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Define extent and nature of non-conformance
|
|
Identify target performance relevant to area or department prior to non-conformance Completed |
Evidence:
|
Source information and discuss with internal stakeholders to determine commencement and expected duration of non-conformance Completed |
Evidence:
|
Source information and discuss with internal and external stakeholders to determine business impact and related indicators from non-conformance Completed |
Evidence:
|
Liaise with customers to determine minimum acceptable performance during period of non-conformance Completed |
Evidence:
|
Disseminate information to stakeholders
|
|
Determine information needed by stakeholders and communication methods to promote understanding and application of information Completed |
Evidence:
|
Oversee collation and/or development of information to meet identified needs Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify communications and confidentiality protocols and obtain any approvals for dissemination of information Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor effectiveness of information and communications and modify to better achieve desired outcomes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine priority responses
|
|
Develop possible responses to defined non-conformance to contain impact and eliminate or minimise escalation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine timing of responses and resource requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine evaluation criteria and apply them to prioritise implementation of responses Completed |
Evidence:
|
Obtain approvals and resources allocation for priority responses in accordance with procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implement priority responses
|
|
Initiate responses and establish data and information collection and analysis protocols Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse data and information to determine progress of responses to achieving required outcomes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Modify responses, including deployment of resources, to better achieve desired outcome Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plan return to conformance
|
|
Facilitate processes to determine cause/s which can be eliminated or managed within own area or department Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop plan to address identified cause/s within own area or department Completed |
Evidence:
|
Obtain required sign-off for planned actions Completed |
Evidence:
|
Oversee implementation of remedial plan within own area or department and establish normal or new normal conformance Completed |
Evidence:
|
Re-establish conformance
|
|
Conduct debrief with area or department personnel and, where relevant, other internal stakeholders Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recognise need for additional assistance for personnel arising from non-conformance and/or responses and initiate action to address needs Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate effectiveness of response function and communications to determine improvements to processes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Evaluate responses, remedial action and re-established conformance to determine learnings, preventative measures and recommendations for standardisation and/or further improvements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Complete and communicate reports and recommendations according to organisational requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|